Die Bundeswehr begreift Peak Oil

Immerhin – diese Informationen hatten seit 2005 bereits die Schweden, die seither ihren Ölausstieg verfolgen, 2006 kam der Dokumentarfilm „The Oil Crash“ in die Kinos, 2008 veröffentlichte die EnergyWatch Group ihre saubere Studie zu Peak Oil und jetzt merkt auch die Bundeswehr, wo der Hase langläuft.

peak-oil.com/download/Peak%20Oil.%20Sicherheitspolitische%20Implikationen%20knapper%20Ressourcen%2011082010.pdf

Da Buy Viagra Online No Prescription können wir ja erwarten, dass die CDU in 4-5 Jahren reagiert.

Task Force 373 – was unsere Freunde so treiben

Johannes Stern schreibt in WSWS …“Während Medien und Politik versuchen, die Veröffentlichung der Wikileaks-Dokumente herunterzuspielen, wird immer deutlicher, dass die Bundeswehr bereits nahezu alle Beschränkungen, die ihr bei der Gründung auferlegt Buy cheap Viagra wurden, überwunden hat. Mittlerweile hat sie auch die Politik des gezielten Tötens übernommen, wie sie von der amerikanischen, britischen und israelischen Armee bereits seit langem praktiziert wird.“ – der Meinung bin ich auch!

SJ

www.tomdispatch.com/post/175287/tomgram:_pratap_chatterjee,_manhunters,_inc./#more

www.wsws.org/de/2010/jul2010/buwe-j31.shtml

www.diarydig.org/

Das Existenzrecht Israels – kurz auf den Punkt gebracht

Von Alan Hart

Israel’s right or not to exist – The facts and truth

According to history as written by the winner, Zionism, Israel was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the UN Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. This is propaganda nonsense.

In the first place

the UN without the consent of the majority of the people of Palestine did not have the right to decide to partition Palestine or assign any part of its territory to a minority of alien immigrants in order for them to establish a state of their own.

Despite that, by the narrowest of margins, and only after a rigged vote, the UN General Assembly did pass a resolution to partition Palestine and create two states, one Arab, one Jewish, with Jerusalem not part of either. But the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal – meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.

The truth is that the General Assembly’s partition proposal never went to the Security Council for consideration. Why not? Because the U.S. knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force given the extent of Arab and other Muslim opposition to it; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.

So the partition plan was vitiated (became invalid) and the question of what the hell to do about Palestine – after Britain had made a mess of it and walked away, effectively surrendering to Zionist terrorism – was taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion.

The option favoured and proposed by the U.S. was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence – actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.

The truth of the time was that the Zionist state, which came into being mainly as a consequence of pre-planned ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point, could have no right to exist UNLESS … Unless it was recognised and legitimized by those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state. In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved.

And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not and cannot take from the Palestinians by force.

Alan Hart, November 2009

Ja! So sieht´s nämlich aus.
Dank an Steinbergrecherche. SJ